Core 1.1, Professor Wilson
Second writing assignment
Spring 2007
This writing assignment presents another opportunity to demonstrate critical thinking skills in reading and writing about ancient texts. I remind you of some of the learning objectives that are specifically related to critical thinking in this course:
With those objectives in view, please choose one (1 only)
of the following topics on which to write a 3 (minimum) to 4 (maximum)
page
critical essay. Use NO secondary
sources for your essays, such as books, introductions, or articles; the
assignment is intended to reflect your own ability to read and
critically
interpret [ancient] texts, not your ability to use scholarly (or
popular
internet!) sources.
Your
essay should have a clearly-articulated thesis
statement; the essay should marshal very specific evidence adduced from
the
texts and what we have learned about their ancient contexts (e.g.,
literary, historical,
philosophical, cultural) in a coherent argument in support of the
thesis. Review carefully the six critical
thinking skills by which the substance of your essay will be evaluated:
Your grade also takes into account mechanics, clarity,
and elegance. Be sure to leave
yourself plenty of time to proofread and revise.
1. Write a
friendly but scholarly response to Nicholas Kristof's use of Greek and
Roman
classical literature in support of his argument about President Bush
and the
Iraq war. Your comments should not
reflect on the position Kristof takes in respect of the President and
the war
but, very specifically, on his use of the classics as 'timeless' works
that are
as much about 'us' as about ancient heroes and statesmen.
You should write a coherent description
of another way of reading the texts in their diverse contexts, which
reveals
not only similarities to 'us' (i.e., a socially constructed 'us') but
also
significant differences. You
should refer to specific texts and contexts and, if applicable, to
generic
conventions. Discuss what
difference this other way of reading the 'classics' might (or might
not) make
in how we use them in discussion of contemporary issues.
2. Compare
and contrast the cultural construction of pederasty in the speech of
Pausanias
(Plato's Symposium)
and in Better
Argument's speech in lines 961-983 (approximately) in Aristophanes' Clouds. Your
essay
should take into account differences in genre as well as how each
speech
advances the overarching purpose (as you understand it) of the text as
a whole. Engage is critical analysis, not
just
description.
3.
Thucydides and Virgil both wrote at a time when their cities
wielded
tremendous imperial power. Both
used speeches by characters – Thucydides historical statesmen and
Virgil
mythical gods and heroes—to articulate justification for their power
and
the wars waged to achieve and maintain it. Choose
one (1) speech in Thucydides and one (1) in Virgil
that provide justification for each empire. Analyze
those texts in their relevant contexts in order to
compare and contrast the justifications.
Is the justification called into question, explicitly or
implicitly, in
each work and if so, how (specifically!).