This choice seems invalid because the area is underlain by bedrock. Also, if it was underlain by loose material, that would contradict differential erosion.
G | Likely | The landform is underlain by well-sorted layers of loose material. This choice seems invalid because the area is underlain by bedrock. Also, if it was underlain by loose material, that would contradict differential erosion. |
Because at least one valid 'likely' choice has been found, 'unlikely' and 'no evidence' choices need not be considered. After all, a choice cannot be both 'likely' and at the same time be 'unlikely' or show 'no evidence'. |
H | Unlikely | The landforms are underlain by bedrock, not loose material. |
I | Unlikely | There is no correlation between the Erosion-Resistance Index and elevation. |
J | Unlikely | There is good correlation between the Erosion-Resistance Index and elevation. |
K | Unlikely | The landform is underlain by loose material, not bedrock. |
L | Unlikely | There is no parallelism between the land surface and the layers. |
M | Unlikely | The landform is underlain by material consistent with that deposited by ice. |
N | No Evidence | The higher areas are covered by loose material; the lower areas are underlain by bedrock. |
O | No Evidence | Because there are no layers, parallelism between the land surface and the underlying layers cannot be tested. |
P | No Evidence | The land surface is not quite parallel to underlying layers. |