|
12--good summary of M-F overall view--stats
very significant here--why did trade now seem to
have a different effect than what we saw in the Liss reading? Or did it
have a different effect? |
|
12-14--evolution of pro-Spanish foreign policy
by the US--worth reading closely: how much did this change the US approach
to Latin America? |
|
14-19--skim, but come away with the ability to
answer why Britain cared about the Western Hemisphere. Clearly London had
different ideological, commercial, and strategic interests than did the
US; and also: how much attention should we as students of this period pay
to the French and Spanish activities |
|
20-21--read very closely: 1848 as critical. Do
you agree with M-F? If so, why? And were "commercial
benefits for the different regions of the United States" the
key to understanding US policy in the Caribbean? |
|
22-24--skim: key point is the
"sectionalization" of Manifest Destiny |
|
25--28--read closely--good summary of
filibustering, both its origins, and, more important, its effect on the
diplomacy of the region |
|
28--"European
statesmen viewed the region as a monolithic unit"--important
in understanding future course of events in DR |
|
28-31--skim, covers events in DR--role of both
Spain and Haiti as major rivals to US there, and also the degree to which
US Northern commercial interests, rather than Southern slaveholders,
shaped US policy--no slavery in the DR |
|
31-32--PP starting with "The decade
leading to 1852 . . ." very important to get a sense of M-F's
argument |
|
32-33--read closely: growing intersection
between domestic politics and foreign policy toward the Caribbean--we'll
be covering this is some detail in class; Pierce and diplomatic corps
quite important (see Ostend Manifesto document assignment for today) |
|
34-40--skim, as long as you understand the
effects of the Africanization of Cuba scare
and the Ostend Manifesto |
|
40-41: again, we see the issue of race appear,
and, unsurprisingly, the Haitian connection as well |
|
42-44: skim--details lengths to which US
administrations went on racial issue in approaching the DR |
|
44-49--read very closely--linkage between
domestic events in the DR and international rivalry Haiti, Spain, France,
and US |
|
49-52--skim: good summary of changing European
attitudes toward Caribbean events; more conciliatory attitude by Spain and
UK |
|
53-57--skip: we'll be doing this next week |
|
58-68 (through page break in middle of page):
:another key aspect of M-F's argument--what does he mean by "dual
colonialism"? This section should be read closely, both to get
a sense of how the Spanish empire operated in the Caribbean Basin and to
see how he uses the term informal empire to describe the US policy |