Shaping of the Modern World

 

  Section 5

 

   Contents
   Readings
   Caucus
   Search
   Links
   Glossary
   Portraits
   Movies
Brooklyn College Core Curriculum:
The Shaping of the Modern World

Section 5:The Enlightenment

Introduction: This Week's Goals

The Enlightenment was a cultural movement which applied the insights of the Scientific Revolution to the wider world: to politics, to religion, and to art.

The Scientific Revolution involved some really deep thinking about the nature of the Universe.  Although it was important, there were probably not more than a few hundred people in all Europe at the time who understood what was happening. The Enlightenment can be thought of as a process of making the findings of the Scientific Revolution much more widely available.

The Scientific Revolution reached its high point at the end of the 17th century with the work of Newton. It was the work of scientists from many different countries (Italy, Germany, Denmark, Holland, Poland, England, France).  The Enlightenment took place in the 18th century and was dominated by France, which was also by far the most powerful state of the period.

One useful way of thinking about the Enlightenment is as a project to remake society in accordance with the values of Reason, Toleration, and Natural Law. In one sense, as we shall see, the United States can be considered an Enlightenment Project.

By the end of this section you should:

  • Know the main themes of the Enlightenment.
  • Be familiar with the philosophes.
  • Be able to discuss the social setting of the Enlightenment, especially the role of women and salons.
  • Know about the work of Voltaire and Diderot.
  • Be able to explain why the Encyclopedia was important.
  • Be able to discuss Montesquieu's political ideas and their application to the United States constitution.
  • Understand the contributions of Rousseau in the following areas-
    • Theory of origins of property
    • Theory of Civil society as opposed to Natural society
    • Theory of the General Will and Popular Sovereignty
    • Romanticism
  • Be able to discuss the main "Enlightened Despots".

Text

Kagan, 604-5, 609-38

Multimedia

Images

Sources

The Enlightenment is a period which produced many interesting ideas and source. There is quite a wide selection for this section. But not all of these are equally important. Make sure to read the six documents which are starred *. The two readings form Rousseau are the ones we will discuss most in Caucus.  If you want to read more see the Enlightenment page of the Modern History Sourcebook.

Outline

[NOTE: For those of you interested in the history of Philosophy, there is an additional outline available on The Development of Western Philosophy. The leading figures of the Enlightenment are called "philosophes", a French word which means "philosopher".  Men such as Voltaire and Diderot, however, were not so much "philosophers" as "public intellectuals". They knew about the work of scientists and philosophers, and discussed that work, but did not make any original contributions. The outline on philosophy gives some background, but it is not necessary that you read it.]

I. Introduction

We ended the last section by mentioning the Enlightenment proper - a period of publicization of the more austere thought of others by men known as philosophes.

II. Where,  When, and Why?

A. England

Many of the most progressive ideas and developments had taken place in England in the 17th Century.

  • Science: Newton,
  • Philosophy: Locke,

    AND
  • Politics: 1688 the Glorious Revolution.

These developments had a real influence on the Frenchmen we discuss here -

  • Voltaire visited England and wrote letters in praise of it
  • Montesquieu based his views on the separation of powers in government on his (mis)understanding of the English Government.

B. France

So far we have been wandering all over Europe but all these new ideas came together and were popularized, especially in France.

III. Definitions

A. Enlightenment

The Enlightenment and liberal thought in general, with Voltaire and Diderot leading the way, emphasized

  • REASON,
  • TOLERATION and
  • NATURAL LAW,
  • plus a confidence in modern man and his achievements - the idea of PROGRESS.
  • ABOVE ALL THEY PROMOTED THE IDEA OF CHANGE AND PROGRESS AS GOOD THINGS. THIS HAS BECOME A VERY DISTINCTIVE MARK OF THE MODERN WORLD.
  • *Condorcet (1743-94): On the Future Progress of the Human Mind 1794

B. Philosophes

The people who were the thinkers in France were known as PHILOSOPHES. They were not on the whole original thinkers, but were great publicists of the new ideas.

C. Social Context

The social context of the Philosophes was uniquely civilized: a Salon society presided over by educated women hostesses. [Most of the men were anti-feminist but this was a time when aristocratic women did have a lot of power in society.]

[See the movie Dangerous Liasions for an interesting representation of the society of 18th Century France]

IV. Voltaire (Francois-Marie Arouet) 1694-1778

A. Life

1726-29 Visited England.

Spent the latter part of his life in exile near Geneva. He was referred to as the Roi de Fernay ["King" of his estate.]

Voltaire was the most famous philosophe and he was not an aristocrat, rather a very rich bourgeois.

He was above all concerned with human action and attempts to improve human life. He was one of the very best French writers; read him and you will see that he gets his ideas across in the most charming and witty way possible: for example in Candide, an attack on Leibniz's philosophy that "we live in the best of all possible worlds", is also extremely funny.

B. Works

  • Letters on the English 1733
  • Lettres philosophiques 1734
  • Elements of the Philosophy of Newton
  • Candide 1759
  • Dictionnaire Philosophique 1764

C. Thought

  • Voltaire promoted Free Speech, Civil Rights and Toleration.
  • He was extremely anticlerical. He used to write "Ecrasez L'infame" ["destroy the infamy" - i.e. removes the Church from power in society] on all his letters.  This anticlericalism was inspired by the Calas case (a Protestant was falsely accused and killed for killing his son to stop him becoming Roman Catholic.) This is important in explaining the extreme anti-clericalism of the French Revolution. It was not present in English thinkers.
  • Voltaire was not a "liberal" in many ways. He praised Louis XIV and thought Enlightened despotism was the best government, as a monarchy could keep down the Church and the aristocracy.
  • He was also anti-Semitic, possibly due to equating Jews with the Church, possibly due to problems he had with money lenders. Neither is an excuse.
  • He was powerful because he was such a good writer. Even today Candide is read for pleasure.

V. Diderot and the Encyclopedia

Denis Diderot 1713-84
Jean le Rond D'Alembert 1717-83

A. The Encyclopedia 1751-72 17 vols.

The Encyclopedia was a central institution of the Enlightenment thinkers. Its aim was to include all knowledge.

All the leading philosophes wrote for it in signed articles and so it shows many different views: for instance there is a debates on "luxury" - Voltaire thought it was good, but others, looking to ancient Sparta thought it was contrary to virtue.

Volume 2 was banned - which only made it more  popular.

B Publicity

The Encyclopedia shows Philosophes/Enlightenment as part of a process of publicity. They got their ideas into all the reading public's mind. About 25,000 were sold, half outside France.

At Besancon [28,000 pop] 137 sets sold -

  • 15 to clergy,
  • 53 to nobles,
  • 69 to lawyers, doctors, merchants and govt officials

The groups most criticized, nobles and clergy, actually bought it more than other groups.

C. Ideals

  • It promoted ideals of toleration, reason and progress, equality before the law (for all the 3 estates) -
  • It saw the state as the agency for progress, opposition to the Church and Faith.

    IT DIFFUSED THESE IDEAS AROUND EUROPE.

V. The Enlightenment, Deism, and Religion

A. Introduction

This was not a great age for theology: there were it must be emphasized movements of popular piety, pietism and Methodism, but religion did not hold the intellectual leaders as it had during the Reformation.

B. Deism

Deism was idea that God set up the Universe as clockwork and then just let it run. It proposed a non-ritual religion based on REASON. In fact this was not as strong as Faith, as reasonable arguments can be and are disproved.

Deists also attacked Christianity, especially Catholicism, as superstitious.

Deism was the belief of many philosophes and was actually made a state religion for a short while during the French Revolution

C. Age of Reason?

Note the contrast: One age, the Reformation, has Christ suffering for humanity on the Cross as the image of God, the next has God as a Watchmaker.

VI. Enlightenment Political Thought

One of most creative aspects of the Enlightenment was its use of new philosophy in a practical way to discuss politics. One of the most commonly asked questions about the French Revolution is about the influence of these ideas - their influence on American events is even more certain.

As mentioned in the last class the earliest of the new political thinkers were Hobbes and Locke. The English political experience of the 17th century and the problems of the Stuarts were a starting point for political thought.

A. English Thinkers - Absolutism, and the beginnings of Liberalism.

a. Thomas Hobbes 1588-1662

  1. An Atheist - 2nd son of a vicar. He was a late maturer as a thinker. He was opposed to the English Revolution and had gone into exile in 1640.
  2. Leviathan 1651, is his masterpiece.
    It was based on the New Science and observation. He thought his new subject of study was on a par with the work of his friends William Harvey and Galileo. All he had to do was find the right method.
  3. He was, in the tradition of the Scientific Revolution, concerned with the natural state of affairs. Machiavelli 1469- 1527, was an obvious influence. He was also influenced by Thucydides. He had translated the entire Peloponnesian War.
  4. His political science was based on reason not moralistic prescription - this was to be future of this science.
  5. The Hobbesian View of Men -see Leviathan chap 13 "The life of man is nasty brutish and short". There is a need for a state to control, although the aim is the welfare of all. Absolute power for a leader is needed.
  6. His theoretical basis was absolute materialism. Hobbes thought that matter was all that existed: men where just part of conflict in nature. For Hobbes the whole Universe including politics is mechanical. Thus his ideas have a NATURAL LAW element.
  7. Hobbes wants a tightly ordered commonwealth, not a Tyranny, ruled by law and order. His work shows in detail what powers he thinks a state must have in order to do its job.
  8. Note here: Idea of Reason of State vs. Divine Right. [Hobbes ahead of his time - Bousset and Domat wrote later, but Hobbes was more influential in long run]

b. John Locke 1632-1704

  1. Introduction
    Locke is part of the central tradition of western liberal thought and even Republicans are liberals in these terms. Locke + Smith = Classic liberalism.
  2. Political Works
    Two Treatises on Government 1690
    This was more or less written before the Glorious Revolution of 1688, but is often seen as justifying it.
    Letter on Toleration 1689
    Locke is less original than Hobbes but more influential. He opposed Hobbes but was also influenced by Science, Newton, plus medieval ideas opposing absolute power and supporting Natural Law. He referred to the theologian Richard Hooker a great deal.
  3. Philosophical Basis of Locke's Views
    Locke's psychology/epistemology shows his view of man: Man is rational, born equal (one of implications of a tabula rasa at birth). What motivates people is pleasure and avoidance of pain (This was not questioned until Freud). Government should try to mold behavior with pleasure and pain: it should manipulate the environment, and use education to make better people.
  4. Theory of Government
    Man's NATURAL state was of harmony with each other and equality. But without a government there are "inconveniences": no law or judges.
    People make a contract with government to protect their rights. THIS WAS A RATIONAL NOT A THEOLOGICAL reason for government. The people have a natural(= Divine) right to oppose governments that do not keep the contract: an argument used by American colonists.
  5. Natural Rights and Civil Rights
    Because Man is born equal he has rights: government exists to protect these rights. Locke's theory was that there were NATURAL RIGHTS - to "life, liberty and property"
    His view was that people SHOULD have these rights to be fully human.
    Natural Law is deduced, there was no empirical basis for it. Locke has a rationalist not an empiricist approach to this aspect of his thought.
  6. Locke and Equality
    As well as natural rights, Locke also stressed equality. By this he meant not that all should possess, or be, the same, but that all should be equal before the law. He doesn't really mean anything more.
  7. Slavery
    Locke did not oppose slavery, just like the liberal founding fathers. This must fundamentally be attributed to racism, since, for Locke, a slave is not fully able to realize his/her humanity, he must have thought that black slaves did not require it in the same way as bourgeois Englishmen.
  8. The point to note that although his theories may be evaluated by us as good or bad they also have a definite aim: to promote the interests of the middle class, and black slavery was at that time profitable to the English middle class.
NATURAL RIGHTS ?
  • Natural Rights are based on the idea of Natural Law, which looks to idea that Man is a rational animal: this has problems for modern non-rational ideas of Man.
  • The Right to Life - but he allows capital punishment.
  • Right to Liberty - This means being able to do what you want to do under the Law (this was also allowed by Hobbes).Most of life is not to be regulated: for Locke, you are free but on your own.

The Right to Property - the right to keep what you own, and for Locke this meant land. For Locke the right to property flows out of man's right to possess his body (liberty) and so to possess the fruits of his body(work). You are entitled to what you work for. This is the idea behind modern conservative opposition to taxes, but it is also a Marxist idea directed against capitalists. Locke also links the right to property with the right to a livelihood and so the right to life.

c. Adam Smith 1723-90 and Economics

The Wealth of Nations 1776

  1. Smith founded the science of Economics,(cf. Hobbes and Political Science).
  2. He wrote in opposition to Mercantilism: the theory that a positive trade balance should be promoted by government intervention and tariffs.
  3. He proposed an economic system that would be seen as "the OBVIOUS and simple system of NATURAL liberty"
  4. The Theory
    General welfare depends on allowing the individual to promote his/her interest freely within the laws of justice. In this way he will more effectually promote the interest of society than if he actually tries to promote it. This worked by individuals rationally calculating their chances in the MARKET.
  5. Background
    The background to this idea was Locke's idea that people are motivated above all by pleasure. Smith from this base proposed the existence of laws of supply and demand. His theory of economics is based on the idea of unintended consequences of actions. He explains that all will be for the best with the idea of an invisible hand: there is an element of faith here - the invisible hand fills the position of Angels in explaining unexplainable movement in Middle Ages.
  6. Laissez Faire
    Because of these views he thought government should not interfere in the economy - This is the idea of Laissez-Faire. He still gives government a place in in the Judiciary, the Army, Navy and Police.
  7. Nature and Economics
    Smith's ideas were based on idea of exploiting nature to use it for man's enrichment. This has been dominant theme in modern western history and theory, both capitalist and Marxist; now we are faced with environmental problems.
  8. Smith was more subtle than this summary: but often complex ideas get reduced to their bones and have their influence in their unsophisticated form.
    He was writing at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, but his ideas were adopted for there theoretical usefulness to the exploiting middle class as well as for their undoubted greatness: they gave the new middle class the opportunity to believe that greed was for the benefit of society and so escape the guilt that Christianity had always attributed to greed.

C. French Thinkers

a. Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu

  1. Life
    1689-1755. Montesquieu was an aristocrat in south-west France and a president of the Parlement of Bordeaux, a position he inherited from his father; so basically he was an aristocrat who rejected Absolutism and looking back to old aristocratic liberties.
  2. Persian Letters 1721
    A way of dealing with censorship: censorship was less and less pervasive in France after 1750, but still tended to make French writer address things in an abstract, unconcrete manner. There was by contrast very little censorship in England, although there was always some.
  3. De l'esprit des lois 1748 The Spirit of the Laws
    The Spirit of the Laws was written after 14 years study of laws and thinkers, including Locke. It presents two main ideas.
    ---It classified governments not on basis of location of power but on the animating principle: Republics - virtue, Monarchies - honor, Despotism - fear. No one system was suitable everywhere. Montesquieu was less hooked on systems than other writers: he thought that allowance should be made for the traditions, economy and religion of a country. He thought that despotism was suited to hot climates where it was necessary to force lazy people to work!
    ---More influential was his theory of separation of powers: executive, judicial, and legislative. This was based on a certain perception of English government, with its King, House of Lords, and House of Commons.
    ---He wanted to use this principle in the politics of France: he would give power to parlements, towns, aristocracy to counter the monarchy. He was in many ways a political conservative arguing in fervor of aristocracy: although he recognized that the aristocracy of his day was corrupt, he thought this was due to the corruption of absolutism.
  4. He influenced the framers of US Constitution 1787, more so than the Declaration of Independence.

b. Jean-Jacques Rousseau 1712-78

Rousseau was born in Geneva of a lower class background. His mother died as a result of his birth and he had a lot of hang-ups: these are shown in his Confessions. He seems to have been paranoid, and later in life he treated his five children very badly: he put them in an orphanage.

In 1741, he moved to Paris and became friendly with the philosophes. He became well know with his Essay on the Progress of the Arts and Sciences in which he argued against progress as it removed men from their natural state.

He contributed to the Encyclopedia.

2. Works

  • Discourse on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences 1750
  • Discourse on the Origin of Inequality 1755
  • Emile 1762
  • On the Social Contract 1762

3. Foundations of Rousseau' Thought

  • The basic thrust of his thought was a concern with virtue. Adam Smith wanted people to be prosperous, Rousseau wanted to make them good.
  • His view of property shows a horror of modern society, which he said began with the first person put a fence around his land and people were stupid enough to believe it.

4. Political Vision of On the Social Contact

  • For Rousseau the Social Contract the basic law of society. Liberty is obedience to the law you have accepted, and equality means all are equally dependent on society and not on any other individual.
  • The Social Contact should be written by a legislator, Moses or Lycurgus, who should then depart the scene - Forcing men to be free.
  • So Rousseau wants liberty and equality in society but denies these are natural. Rather he wants civil liberty and equality, that is he wants them granted by the state. The rights you have are the ones you have in the community, to which you give all your natural liberty and equality when you joined it.
  • The social contract was not between government and people, but between people themselves, therefore the best society was a participatory democracy, like ancient Athens, Geneva, or New England towns.
  • Rousseau's society depends on public spiritedness, compared with Locke and Smith for whom the most important part of life was private. In general Rousseau is out of tune with individualistic liberalism and greed.
  • Sovereign Power and General Will
    The people are the source of legitimate sovereignty. Sovereignty then resides in the people, but how to express this in action. Rousseau came up with the idea of a General Will.
  • The idea of a General Will was the principle behind the validity of the Social Contract. It is a very important concept: political society is seen as involving the total subjection of every individual to the General Will of the whole. The problem is discovering what the General Will is: for Rousseau it is NOT the same as the wishes of majority, rather it is what is in their best interests. That is why Rousseau said some Legislator should point to the mandate of heaven to get his law accepted. People should be "forced to be free": the aim was to create a more virtuous human being.

4. Effects of Rousseau's Thought

  • He was not much read at first. He first becomes influential on the Jacobins and Robespierre. He is very important in later political theorizing.
  • Rousseau's arguments for democracy and equality had a generally liberal effect in the US and Britain
  • But the idea of the General Will, which is not the same as majority vote, has encouraged those who believe in Vanguards of Revolution, and provides a framework for totalitarianism in its modern sense. It has real totalitarian implications, especially the idea that the people may not know their own will.

5. Rousseau and Romanticism

  • Jean Jacques Rousseau (1712-78): Emile
  • Rousseau was also a forerunner of Romanticism, a sort of reaction to both empiricism and rationalism that rejected reason as only criterion of truth and which exalted feelings.
  • This was Rousseau's greatest effect in his life time with Emile, which encouraged parents to love their children, although of course Rousseau was no example of this.
  • There was a sort of cult around Rousseau chez women readers.He spread respect for feelings and the common people and, despite way he treated his own children, people were inspired by his writings to look after their own: in some ways he was the beginning of modern humanitarianism.
  • Rousseau also promoted the idea of the Noble Savage, in Discours sur l'Origine de l'inegalite parmi les hommes - 1755. This is. of course in contrast to his view in On the Social Contract that you should try to make people better.
  • ROUSSEAU'S IDEAS VERY OFTEN DO NOT ADD UP. HE IS MESS OF CONTRADICTIONS
    --- DEMOCRACY & TOTALITARIANISM
    ---NOBLE SAVAGE & NEED FOR EDUCATION.

VII. Did Enlightenment thinkers effect the French Revolution?

Rousseau had an effect during the course - but in next lecture one of the things to look at is the overall effect of these thinkers. Their long term effect is pretty clear, we shall be looking at short term effect.

VIII. America and the Enlightenment

A. American Thinkers

  • Benjamin Franklin
  • Thomas Jefferson.

B. America - The Enlightenment Project

C. The Constitution used many of the ideas above.

  • Locke - "Life, Liberty and Property".
  • The idea of just opposition to despotism.
  • Montesquieu - The idea of separation of powers.

D. America was an example of practical freedom; the Goldene Medina. This had a definite effect on Europe.

IX. Enlightened Despotism

As Enlightenment ideals spread through Europe, they affected a generation of monarchs. Raison d'etat [reason of state] rather than Divine Right became the justification of their rule.

A. Austria

Maria Theresa 1740-1780
Joseph II 1780-1790

These monarchs centralized the state and put an and end to local diets. This was a non-national state, but as yet there was little nationalism.

B. Prussia

Frederick the Great 1740-1789

Frederick had low view of people. He ran the state as a military regime. He seized Silesia for "reasons of state". He was a great ruler, but left no trained successor and Napoleon was almost able to destroy Prussia. However, Prussia was made so much stronger than any other German state that it was to unite Germany in the next century, and impose a sort of Prussian patina to the country.

C. Russia

Catherine the Great 1762-96

A German princess who deposed her imbecile husband. Russia was still in most primitive condition and she kept serfdom.

D. The Division of Poland

These three monarchs divided Poland between them in 1772,1793 and 1795.

The Absolutist states succeeded - and older states faded - Poland, The Holy Roman Empire, The Ottoman Empire.

Web Exercise

The web project this week picks up on a theme of the Enlightenment - the Encyclopedia. Many students like encyclopedias as handy reference tools, so this week we are going to evaluate what you find in online encyclopedias about the people we have been reading, and compare that information with what you yourself see after you have read something written by the same people.

Let's stick with three philosophes [you only need do the project on one of them]

  • Voltaire
  • Diderot
  • Rousseau

You can find information about them at:

  • The Encyclopedia Britannica [This should be accessible from computers at your schools. If your from home, you can get a "trial subscription" for a week.]
  • Encarta [Concise version is free. Full version can be had for free for seven days]
  • The Columbia Encyclopedia
  • Compton's Online Encyclopedia [This also has a seven day trial subscription. For those with AOL it is available already: the keyword is "comptons"]
  • Hutchinson's Encyclopedia [This one is only available on AOL. Use keyword "encyclopedias", then choose "More Encyclopedias"]

Note: if you sign up for a "free trial" to access these online publications, you are under no obligation to give your full name, full correct address, or even your main email address. If you do, the companies will add you to their database. You have a right to protect your privacy.

Your job is to look up one of the philosophes in at least two of the encyclopedias.

  • Explain which encyclopedia is best for your subject, and why? Explain the strengths and weaknesses of each encyclopedia.
  • What do you gain by looking at the original texts by the author rather than just looking at an encyclopedia?

Discussion Questions

What were the major formative influences on the Enlightenment thinkers?

How did the Enlightenment change basic attitudes to reform, faith, reason and science?

What methods did the philosophes use to spread their ideas?

Why did the philosophes oppose religion?

What was the role of women in the thought of the philosophes?

Was Montesquieu's view of England accurate?

Did the Enlightened Despots really believe in Enlightenment ideals, or were they just using them as propaganda?

Are Enlightenment ideals universally true?

 Shaping of the Modern WorldContents Page

 

 

Site Design: Paul Halsall

©
created 9/11/1998 : revised 3/7/1998