|
One for One: For clarity's sake, a single pronoun can only refer to one singular or compound compound antecedent. Yes: Renee spoke, but she was not heard over the crowd. No: Renee spoke, but she was not heard over the crowd though she tried to be loud. The final sentence above creates too much confusion. It's clear that Renee was not heard, but who is the second she? Perhaps is was Renee, but it may not have been. In long passages the confusion grows: Stephen raced to the car, so he didn't hear his dad calling him back to the house. Apparently, he had just received a very important phone call from the admissions officer of the college to which he had applied earlier that semester. Perhaps the officer had called him to inform him that he had been accepted to the school. Keeping Pronouns & Antecedent Together: Another reason for such confusion is that too much material comes between the pronoun and its antecedent. The first he may be clear, but both the antecedent of Stephen and his dad could be the antecedent of the second mention of he. It would probably be best to mention the antecedent again just to be clear: Stephen raced to the car, so he didn't hear his dad calling him back to the house. Apparently, his dad had just received a very important phone call from the admissions officer of the college to which Stephen had applied earlier that semester.
Indefinite Pronouns as Antecedents: Indefinite pronouns should be considered as singular antecedents and should therefore have a singular referent. Yes: No one knows his or her student identification number by heart. No: No one knows their student identification number by heart. Other Ambiguity: Where's the Antecedent? It said on television that the stock market is in a crisis. Who does it refer to? They say that it's important to floss after every meal. Who are they? I agree with this statement. What statement is this referring to? The final example above is often seen as the opening sentence of an essay response to some question. Re-write the posed question, and then the above sentence. On it's own, "I agree with this statement" is an ambiguous response to a question (and is highly unacceptable for a formal academic response!) David claims that the environment deserves more of our attention in the modern era. I agree with this statement.
Hua's store has many common food supplies, but it doesn't have soy milk in stock. (Here, it is functioning as personal pronoun) It is a good thing that I brought my umbrella today. (Here, it postpones thing). Beware of over using it in combination sentences:
George, which lives across the street, told me the story. That's silly! You would never refer to George as "which". You would refer to George as "who". Who refers to people and pets: The dog Billy Boy, who recently bit the mailman, growled at me. Which and that refer to objects, plants (if not named like a pet), and animals that are not pets: A bug, which crawled under Gilly's seat in the subway car, made her scream. |