Italian American Literature and
Film
HISTORY OF ITALY and ITALIAN LANGUAGE
1000 Before the Common Era
|
Hebrew Bible |
500 Before the Common Era
|
Greece |
1 Common Era
|
Roman Empire -- Christianity |
Roman Empire |
500 CE
|
Dark Ages |
1000 CE
|
Middle Ages |
1500 CE
|
Renaissance |
1000 BCE
|
500 BCE
|
1 CE
|
1 CE
|
500 CE
|
1000 CE
|
1500 CE
|
Hebrew Bible | Greece | Roman Empire | Christianity | Dark Ages | Middle Ages | Renaissance |
Italy is a "natural" geographical region.
This means it has natural
boundaries that define its territory. It is surrounded on three sides by
the Mediterranean Sea and on the North it is separated from continental
Europe by the highest mountain chain of Europe, the Alps. The fertile, plain portion of the territory is primarily located in the North and in narrow strips along the coasts. The majority of the territory consists of mountains and hills, with limited possibility for agricultural production. The North is very humid, with abundant rainfall and a very large supply of groundwater. The Central and Southern regions, and the major islands, to the contrary are very dry all year round, with severe consequences for agricultural production.
All these factors had and, to a degree still have, crucial consequences
for the political and linguistic history of the country.
|
1000BCE Bible, Egyptian, Persian Empires 500 BCE 0 CE 500 CE 1000 CE 1500 CE 1850 - 1920 1880-1920 CE |
The ancient languages of Italy In antiquity Italy had a small population, made up mostly of independent tribes that spoke a variety of different languages. In comparison to other civilizations of the Mediterranean basin, such as the Egyptians and the Phoenicians, these populations were backward, rather isolated, with limited exchanges and trade practices with the rest of the known world.
Latin, the language of the future rulers of the empire, was just one of the many languages spoken in the peninsula. Along the coasts of Sicily and Calabria, the Greeks had established "colonies" and founded cities where their language dominated. All the other languages were "autochthonous," i.e. indigenous of the areas where they were spoken. Etruscan is an interesting case in that it cannot be shown to belong to any of the language families known to linguists. Recent discoveries using DNA seem to prove that the Etruscan were of Turkik origin, probably originating from the Caucasus area or even east of the Caspian Sea. It makes sense to assume that the language also originates from that area, but thus far there is no evidence of derivation from known stocks.
|
500 BCE Greek Civilization Rome expansion begins 0 CE 500 CE 1000 CE 1300 CE 1400-1500 CE Fall of the EAST. Roman Empire 1850 - 1920 1880-1920 CE
|
753 BCE, "Birth of Rome" According to the legend, the city of Rome was founded on April 21, 753 BCE (Before the Common Era.)
In the legend, that bears many similarities with the story of Moses, the twins Romulus and Remus were saved by a she-wolf who nursed them during infancy. (Click here for more)
|
700 BCE The first major URBAN civilization to appear were the Etruscans, centered in the area of modern Tuscany. They reached maximum power around 700 BCE. At approximately the same time, the Greeks began to occupy and colonize Sicily and Southern Italy, bringing their social organization and scientific knowledge to the country. The ancient names of Italy, in Greek language, were ENOTRIA (Land of Wine) and ESPERIA (The Land where the Sun Sets.)
ETRUSCAN KINGDOM
|
500 BCE The Latins, the people who eventually became the rulers of the Roman Empire, were a small tribe of a few thousand people that occupied the land near the delta of the Tiber River. Rome was their capital.
ITALY BEFORE THE ROMAN EMPIRE
|
500 BCE Greek Civilization Rome expansion begins 0 CE 500 CE 1000 CE 1300 CE 1400-1500 CE Fall of the EAST. Roman Empire 1850 - 1920 1880-1920 CE
|
FROM 510 BCE TO 1453 CE RISE AND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE
|
YEAR 0 OF THE COMMON ERA THE APOGEE OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE Starting from the city of Rome, the Latins expanded their territorial control over Europe, Northern Africa and the Middle East. In 500 years they were the dominant force in the Mediterranean basin. Here is a map of the empire at the time of its maximum expansion. Approximately 25% of the population of the world at that time was ruled by Rome.
|
All Roads Lead to Rome Roman Empire road network (Italy)
Roman Empire road network (Italy)
|
Latin became the lingua franca of the Roman Empire. It was the official language of the administration, of the law, commerce and the military, and, most significantly, of the arts, literature, philosophy.
We can easily compare Latin to contemporary English in terms of its diffusion and its influence. With language also come CULTURE, not simply in terms of art, but, more significantly, in terms of SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS: legal system, bureaucracy, state administration, political organization, financing of public works and infrastructure, military organization and hierarchy and so forth. All these aspects of life were determined by Rome's example and, when they were adopted by the new provinces, it was easier to absorb them using the original language than translate everything in the local languages. We can draw again a similarity between English and technology and their penetration in the world. Infotech speaks English and it makes sense for any culture that is absorbing it, to do so along with the language that conceived it and developed it. Efforts by countries, such as Canada, for instance, to find the French equivalent for every English neologism are destined to crash and eventually fade. |
TO SUMMARIZE: Latin was the official language of the ROMAN Empire, spoken everywhere from Britannia to Armenia. With the fall of the Roman Empire, Latin remained as the ELEGANT, INTELLECTUAL, BUT ALSO FUNCTIONAL LINGUA FRANCA spoken yby the elites. IT WAS ALSO THE ONLY WRITTEN LANGUAGE USED IN THE ENTIRE former Empire. Common people, in the meantime, developed local dialects that diverged progressively from Latin and were influenced by previous local languages. In Italy, the linguistic drift continued until the unification, which was partially accomplished in 1861 and completed in 1870. |
THE REAL CAUSES OF THE
DECLINE AND COLLAPSE OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE But, as everybody knows, the Romans who initially were so virtuous and thrifty, slowly began to get lazy and indulgent: the stayed up too late, wasted industrial amounts of time online, ate lots of junk food, were 420 friendly, went out clubbing, overslept, didn't do their homework and missed quizzes.
According to some sources, a realistic representation of a decadent
Roman party can be found in the film Caligula. |
THE BARBARIAN INVASIONS
|
500 BCE Greek Civilization Rome expansion begins 0 CE 500 CE 1000 CE 1300 CE 1400-1500 CE Fall of the EAST. Roman Empire 1850 - 1920 1880-1920 CE
|
The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire
476 C.E.
First, the Empire was split into two parts in 395 C.E with separate EMPERORS and separate CAPITALS.
The commonly agreed-upon date of the fall of the last Roman Emperor of the WEST (the burgundy-colored part,) Romulus Augustus, was 476 C.E. |
500 BCE Greek Civilization Rome expansion begins 0 CE 500 CE 1000 CE 1300 CE 1400-1500 CE Fall of the EAST. Roman Empire 1850 - 1920 1880-1920 CE
|
You can skip this cell.
THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE WAS THE FIRST ONE TO FALL. WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WE NORMALLY REFER TO THE WESTERN EMPIRE.
SKIP APPROXIMATELY 1,000 YEARS IT IS NOW 1453 C.E. The EASTERN Roman Empire (ochra-colored in the picture above) lasted 1000 years longer, and was finally defeated by the Ottomans (Turks) in 1453 C.E
Miniature showing the conquest of Constantinople by the Ottomans. |
THE
DARK AGES 500 - 1000 C.E.
THE FALL OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE ENTER MARKS THE BEGINNING OF THE DARK AGES (approximately from 500 C.E. until 1200 C.E) |
500 BCE Greek Civilization Rome expansion begins 0 CE 500 CE 1000 CE 1300 CE 1400-1500 CE Fall of the EAST. Roman Empire 1850 - 1920 1880-1920 CE
|
ALL THROUGHOUT THIS LONG PERIOD, LATIN REMAINED THE DE-FACTO UNIVERSAL AND OFFICIAL LANGUAGE OF THE WESTERN WORLD.
THE MAIN REASON FOR ITS ENDURANCE RESTS WITH THE FACT THAT IT WAS THE LANGUAGE OF THE CATHOLIC ROMAN CHURCH. The collapse of central government in the West, lead to the fragmentation of the Empire into a galaxy of small, independent territories ruled by local lords, constantly at war with each other. Italy, in particular, because of its geography, splintered into an infinity of local municipalities. |
WITH THE FALL OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE (476 C.E.) ITALY was split into a myriad of little entities, in a constant state of semi-war with each other, contributing to a climate of instability, insecurity and danger. IT TOOK 1,400 YEARS FOR ITALY TO BE UNIFIED AGAIN (from 476 to 1860).
This should give you an idea of the fragmentation of Italy around the year 1000 C.E.
|
What happened to LATIN? The consequences of the collapse of the Empire were dramatic. In a matter of decades Rome went from a population of about
500,000 to 30,000 (in 600 CE.) Sheep and goats were grazing in what
used to be the Imperial Forum
(see video.) It was spoken by the ruling classes and, most important for its survival, it was kept alive by the Roman Church.
|
The phenomenon of local accents is determined by two major factors. Consider that the uneducated, illiterate masses were AT LEAST 99% of the population. If they spoke Latin at all, they spoke it with heavy local accents, infiltrated with local terminology derived from local dialects.
1) The linguistic SUBSTRATUM (under layer.) If we look at countries where English is one of the official languages, but not the only one, we see the same phenomenon on a grand scale. Take India and South Africa, for instance. English is one of the official languages, and its pronunciation is characteristically different in the two countries. 2) Linguistic IDENTITY and DIFFERENTIATION. Because of the substratum phenomenon, even when the original LOCAL language disappears, people tend to preserve an accent (phonetic differences) in the acquired language. For example, English is everyday language of Scotland, Ireland and Wales. It was imported centuries ago and it grew on a substratum of different local languages. As a result, the English pronunciation is characteristically different in each region. Over the centuries these differences become ingrained in the local pronunciation to the point where the origin of its speakers can be identified instantly. |
When the Roman Empire fell it was dismembered into regions without a strong central authority. Most towns sought to defend themselves erecting walls and fortifications.
Danger was present everywhere in the lawless countryside, and this led to additional isolation. Each town was ruled independently, first by a council of the most powerful families, then, eventually by an autocratic ruler, often an aristocrat. This was the phenomenon of the so called City-States. In these circumstances, over the centuries, local languages developed, with individual characteristics.
These languages became very distinct to the point of being mutually incomprehensible. Some of these local languages stayed closer to Latin while some evolved into almost completely separate idioms.
|
THE MIDDLE AGES IN ITALY FROM A
LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE
More Middle Ages fun, this time from Peter Brueghel (also to be checked out)
During the Middle Ages, from 600 to 1200 CE, Italy was divided into hundreds of local, semi independent city-states and town-states, each with its own rulers, institutions, currency, laws etc. Local wars were constant, with territories being snatched back and forth between rival cities. Alliances were fast made and broken. As soon as a city became too powerful in the eyes of the neighbors, these would create an alliance to fight and contain the ambitions of the rival, with consequent wars, invasions, destructions etc. Then, it was the turn of another city-state to become too powerful, and so forth, ad infinitum. |
THE TURNING POINT IN THE HISTORY OF ITALIAN
LANGUAGE
Eventually, around the 13th century the situation began to stabilize. The largest cities became REGIONAL powers that dominated large portions of nearby territories. In the NORTH the major powers were TURIN (Savoia), MILAN, VENICE and GENOA. In Central Italy, FLORENCE, SIENA and ROME. In the SOUTH NAPLES and in SICILY, PALERMO. ROME was the capital of the PAPAL STATE (in Italian, more effectively, STATO DELLA CHIESA, the Church's state).
The state that eventually unified Italy under its rule in 1870 was the Duchy of Savoia, whose capital was TURIN. |
With all those dialects, WHERE DOES THE REAL ITALIAN LANGUAGE COME FROM? Again, the critical moment was the 13th century.
While initially Siena was the richer and more powerful city, eventually Florence emerged as the dominant power and became the point of reference for the educated classes all over Italy. Tuscan became very fashionable to the point where even pedantic and conservative academics -- i.e. college professors -- began to recognize that the language was as expressive and powerful as Latin. The literati living in other parts of Italy started
writing in Tuscan as well, to imitate the example of the most important artists
of the time. Florentine people, who to this day are fanatically
nationalistic, refused to call their language simply "Tuscan" and
insisted that it be called FLORENTINE. Eventually they succeeded and to
this day Italians refer to FLORENTINE as the "pure," idealized
language of Italy (a language that nobody speaks, not even the
Florentines themselves.) Again, a comparison with English: because of the importance of the U.S. as the center of the most advanced technological research, scientists all over the world communicate in English, write their researches in English and keep up with the progresses of their profession through English language publications. International law, whenever it is
applied, uses English. International tribunals, for trade or violation
of copyright etc. are in English. So are international contracts and so
forth. |
DANTE ALIGHIERI, author of the "DIVINA COMMEDIA" The major literary figures that contribute to the success of Florentine/Tuscan in the rest of Italy are still considered the greatest writers of Italian literature. They all were born in the 13th century.
Dante Alighieri, Firenze (1265-1321) |
FRANCESCO PETRARCA (in English: Petrarch), the inventor of the sonnet, whose idealized, lyrical love poems reverberated throughout European literature for half a millennium.
Francesco Petrarca, Arezzo (1304 -1374) |
GIOVANNI BOCCACCIO, author of the "DECAMERON",
a
collection of one hundred short stories in prose, describing the
everyday life of common people in tragic, comical, ordinary, realistic
situations involving love, sex, money, friendship, betrayal, and all
sort of very human, very recognizable emotions.
Giovanni Boccaccio, Firenze (1313-1375) |
From the 13th century onward there was no question what the "Italian" language really was. Writers drew inspiration from Dante, Petrarca, Boccaccio and other Florentine authors and contributed further to the establishment of Florentine as the noble, literary language of Italy. As economic conditions improved and more and more people learned to read and write, they learned to write Florentine. The uneducated classes continued to speak the local dialects. At the time of the unification in 1870, approximately 50% of the population was illiterate, while another 30%-40% only had one or two year of education. For all practical purposes, Italian was used only in official circumstances or by people who traveled. Yet, all literary works were in Italian. |
UNIFICATION OF ITALY 1848 - 1915
|
THE SECOND MAJOR PUSH was World War 1 (1914-1918). The war was fought on the North-Eastern Front against Austria. Italian soldiers were conscripted from every corner of the peninsula and were forced to communicate using Italian, for practical reasons.
|
RADIO OCTOBER 6, 1924 First national radio broadcast in Italy
First "talkie" The Jazz Singer (1927)
Radio for the first time gave Italians all over the peninsula a chance to HEAR the pronunciation of the standard Italian language. Until 1970, practically EVERY ITALIAN was functionally bi-lingual. Everybody understood and spoke the local language (dialect) and Italian language. It was common to find people who spoke two or three different dialects, in addition to Italian, as in the case of people whose parents had moved from a different region. At home children heard and spoke the native dialect of their parents, on the playground they spoke the local dialects with friends, and finally they used Italian in school. Since 1970, dialects have lost greatly, most of all in the cities. Today it is calculated that approximately 50% of Italian are bilingual and use at least one dialect actively, while the rest use exclusively Italian on a regular basis. |
MAP OF ITALIAN DIALECTS TODAY
|
What does "DIALECT" mean for an Italian? When Italians speak a 'dialect' they actually speak a distinct, separate language with its own phonetic inventory (special, unique sounds), words, grammar and syntax. A DIALECT is a REGIONAL language, different from Italian by varying degrees. Usually, two dialects from different geographical regions, are mutually incomprehensible. However, like English speakers can tell if a someone speaks German or French, the speaker of an Italian dialect can identify the origin of a different dialect. INSIDE one specific geographical area, the local dialect is understood by all. However, each town has its special, unique "flavor". It is relatively easy for a speaker of that dialect from town A to guess where another speaker is from, within that region. DIALECTS are exclusively ORAL LANGUAGES. Sure, some people write poems or songs in various dialects, but those are very limited phenomena, restricted to few examples. --- 0 --- In America, the word "dialect" refers to a set of phonetic differences, i.e. the English language is pronounced with different phonemes. When they speak Italian, Italians also show these LOCAL DIFFERENCES: it is easy for any Italian to guess where another Italian is from based on the way s/he pronounces Italian. We call any regional pronunciation of Italia "ACCENT." |
Over the centuries, geographical distances contributed to mutual incomprehension. Thus, as we would expect, the language of Milan (LOMBARDO) in the North and of Palermo (SICILIANO) in the South became quite different. However, distance is not the only parameter. Often, due to geographical barriers like mountain ranges, tradition, attachment to one's land, suspicion toward neighbors and similar cultural phenomena, even in areas that are relatively close, or even very close, people speak mutually incomprehensible languages. If you look at the areas PIEMONTE and LIGURIA where respectively PIEMONTESE and LIGURE are spoken, they appear to be contiguous.
However, a mountain range makes communications difficult. The two areas were never unified under a common ruler - for over a millennium. As a consequence people developed mutually incomprehensible languages. Even today, when they speak these languages (dialects) they cannot understand each other. Sometimes the lack of comprehension is only a one-way street, whereby the speakers of dialect A can understand partially those of dialect B, but not the other way around. Generally, the closer a local language is to Latin roots, the easier it is for speakers of other dialects to comprehend it. Example: let's take the dialects of Milan and Bergamo. Bergamo's
dialect, particularly the version spoken in the mountain valleys, is
notorious all over Italy for being impenetrable. Milan and Bergamo are
only 40 miles apart, yet speakers of Milanese cannot understand
Bergamasco. To the contrary, Bergamasco speakers have a somewhat
better comprehension of Milanese, although not a complete one and, in
any case, they cannot speak
it.
|