Non-Interacting Models of Inhomogeneous SB
The junction current of an inhomogeneous SB has been proposed
to be described by a parallel conduction model.
In such a model, the junction current is a linear sum of
the contribution from every individual area, namely,
I(Va) = A* T2 [
exp(b Va ) - 1 ]
Si
Ai exp( b Fi )
where Ai and Fi are,
respectively, the area and the SBH of the i-th "patch". Here the
overall transport mechanism has been assumed to be thermionic emission,
as evidenced by the unity ideality factor assumed in the equation.
In general, the transport mechanism can be assumed to be any other
mechanism with only minor modifications. The main assumption behind
the parallel conduction model is the independence, as far as the
electrical conduction is concerned, of the different segments of
an interface to each other. Under this condition, transport theories
for homogeneous SBH can be simply extended to cover inhomogeneous SBs.
Such a model has been applied to describe mixed-phase diodes and also
to analyze SB diodes with an assumed continuous range of SBH.
Interactions at Inhomogeneous SBs
What has been missing from all models based on the parallel conduction
concept is the interaction between neighboring sections of the same
interface. When the actual band bending is considered, not only the
probabilistic distribution of the magnitude of the SBH
is found to be important, but also the length scale with which the
SBH varies is found to be very important. As first revealed by
numerical simulations at MS interfaces and semiconductor-liquid
interfaces, the parallel conduction model is in significant error
when the SBH varies spatially on a scale less than, or comparable
to, the width of the space charge region. The error arises because
Eq. (1) fails to take into account of the potential "pinch-off"
effect, as shown in
Fig. 1, which is a
three-dimensional schematic of a
saddle point near a low-SBH patch in a high-SBH background.
From earlier discussion, it is clear
that the shape of the inhomogeneous SBH has a strong effect on
the current transport. For example, small-amplitude variation
of the SBH and isolated high-SBH patches lead to a junction current
which obeys the parallel conduction model. However, when the
SBH varies with large amplitudes on a small lateral length scale
potential pinch-off occurs and the current transport deviates
considerably from the parallel conduction model.
Numerical simulations gave excellent support to expressing
the total current as a modified sum of currents flowing in each patch,
I(Va) = A* T2 [
exp(b Va ) - 1 ]
Si Ai,eff exp(
b Fi,eff )
where the effective SBH,
Fi,eff, is
simply the local SBH for patches which are not pinched off,
but Fi,eff assumes the
value of the saddle-point potential in front
of the i-th low-SBH patch when pinch-off occurs. Likewise, the
effective area of a patch, Ai,eff, is given in
Table 1 for pinched-off
patches, but reverts to the size of the patch,
Ai, when it is not pinched off. The most important
difference between Eqs. (2) and (1) is that the
Fi,eff's and the
Ai,eff 's depend on bias, temperature, doping level,
geometry, etc., while the Fi 's
and the Ai 's do not. It is the various dependencies
of the parameters in Eq. (2) which leads to a wealth of interesting
I-V characteristics. For example, the increase of the saddle
point potential with forward bias leads to an ideality factor
greater than 1 for the component of current which flows through
this saddle-point.