Political Science 78.5and Women's Studies 41

Professor Paisley Currah                       
Back to Course Home Page                             

 

Questions on Zygmunt Bauman's article, "Nature and Culture"
from Zygmunt Bauman, Thinking Sociologically (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).

1.    As you read the article, identify and take notes on the many dichotomies or binary oppositions that Bauman identifies.

2.    What is culture?  How does Bauman define it?    (See especially pages 143-144.)

3.     Where does the dividing line between nature and culture fall, according to Bauman?  Does the location of this dividing line move?   List an example of this shifting from Bauman and then come up with an example of your own. (144)

4.    Where does cultural authority come from?  (pp. 145- )  What forms does cultural authority take?

5.   Bauman describes two types of "human-made elements" (145) in our lives.  What are they?  (Hint: you might do a chart to compare the two types of order.)  How does are these two orders related?   That is, how does "the order of the world around us" find its counterpart "in the orderliness of our own behavior" (147).  Give an example of each type of order, and explain how they are interrelated by referring to your example. 

6.  Bauman writes, "An artificial order is successfully established once what used to be improbable has been transformed into the necessary or inevitable" (146).  Explain what he means first, with reference to an example of his, and second, by developing your own illustration of this point.

7. What role do structures play in making sense of our world (149)?   List some kinds of structures.  How do oppositions help structure the world (150)?  Give an example or two (at least one of your own).

8.   What is the cultural code (150)?   How is it transmitted?

9.  What are signs and what is their function (150)?    Bauman writes, "it is the opposition between signs which is meaningful, not a single sign taken apart" (154) and "[t]here is neither a causal link nor a similarity between the signs [or signifier, for those who have done some literary theory] and what they stand for [or signified]" (155).  Rather, he argues, the meaning a any sign is based on the distinction it makes from another sign.  He then illustrates his example on page 155 by examining the system of signs that create distinctions between the sexes.  

10.  Bauman writes that signs are always arbitrary (156) but that to those of us who have learned the cultural code very well, "people who can move with facility and without error through the world shaped by a given cultural code" (156-157), signs "do not seem to be arbitrary at all" (157).  First, what does arbitrary mean?  Second, how is it that what is artificial, the product of cultural coding, can seem natural, inevitable?  Give an example.

11.  "Culture may pass for nature most successfully, without questions being asked, as long as the artificiality, the conventional character of the norms it propagates (the fact that these norms could be different from what they are) is not exposed. And the artificiality is unlikely to be revealed if anyone within sight has been subjected to the same type of cultural training" (158).  But in fact people do critique norms all the time.  How is this possible, according to Bauman? 

12.  For today you are also to read two legal cases, Bradwell vs. Illinois (1872) and Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989).  In Bradwell, how does Justice Bradley invoke the cultural code to deny Bradwell's claim?  And second, how does the Price Waterhouse decision show how that very same cultural code has shifted over time?  Be specific.