|
This page is under construction.
In its present form, it is a series of disconnected notes; please read
it in this spirit.
I AM HEATHCLIFF
- How deep a chord Emily strikes with the relationship
of Catherine and Heathcliff is shown by the use Simone de Beauvoir
makes of it in writing of the French tradition of the grandes
amoureuses or the the great female lovers. Catherine's
affirmation "I am Heathcliff" is for de Beauvoir the cry of every
woman in love. In her feminist, existentialist reading, the woman in
love surrenders her identity for his identity and her world for his
world; she becomes the incarnation or embodiment of the man she loves,
his reflection, his double. The basis for this relationship lies in the
roles society assigns to males and females.
The male is the standard or norm, the One; he is the subject who is
capable of choice, of acting, of taking responsibility, and of
affecting his destiny. The female, who is measured against the standard
of the male, becomes the Other, dependent on him; she is an object to
be acted upon by man, the subject; she is given meaning and status by
her relationship to him. She is taught to regard man as godlike and to
worship him; the goal of her existence is to be associated with him, to
love him and be loved by him, because this allows her to share in his
male power and sovereignty. She achieves happiness when the man she
loves accepts her as part of his identity. In reality, because no man
is godlike, she is ultimately disappointed but refuses to acknowledge
his fallibility; because no man can give her either his ability to act
and choose or the character to accept responsibility for those actions
and choices, she does not really achieve or even participate in his
status as subject or standard. She remains dependent, Other. It comes
as no surprise, then, to find that the woman in love, who is seldom the
wife, at least traditionally in France, is the woman who
waits.
- Catherine implies that their love is timeless and
exists on some other plane than her feelings for Linton, which are
conventionally romantic. If their love exists on a spiritual or at
least a non-material plane, then she is presumably free to act as she
pleases in the material, social plane; marrying Edgar will not affect
her relationship with Heathcliff. By dying, she relinquishes her
material, social self and all claims except those of their love, which
will continue after death. Heathcliff, in contrast, wants physical
togetherness; hence, his drive to see her corpse and his arrangements
for their corpses to merge by decaying into each other.
- If identity rather than personal relationship is the
issue or the nature of their relationship, then Catherine is free to
have a relationship with Edgar because Heathcliff's feelings and
desires do not have to be taken into account. She needs to think only
of herself, in effect.
- In Lord David Cecil's view, conflict arises between
unlike characters, and the deepest attachments are based on characters'
similarity or affinity as expressions of the same spiritual principle.
Thus, Catherine loves Heathcliff because as children of the storm they
are bound by their similar natures. This is why Catherine says she
loves Heathcliff "because he's more myself than I am. Whatever
our
souls are made of, his and mine are the same." As the expression of
the principle of the storm, their love is, of course, neither sexual
nor sensual.
- Because of the merging of their identities or,
perhaps it would be more accurate to say, because of their intense
desire to merge and refusal to accept their literal separateness,
Catherine's betrayal of her own nature destroys not only her but
threatens Heathcliff with destruction also.
- Is Catherine deluding herself with this speech? Louis
Beverslius answers yes, Catherine is preoccupied, if not obsessed with
the image of herself "as powerfully, even irresistibly, attracted to
Heathcliff." Their bond is a negative one:
they identify with one another in the face
of a common enemy, they rebel against a particular way of life which
both find intolerable. It is not enough, however, simply to reject a
particular way of life; one cannot define oneself wholly in terms of
what he despises. One must carve out for oneself an alternative which
is more than a systematic repudiation of what he hates. A positive
commitment is also necessary. The chief contrast between Catherine and
Heathcliff consists in the fact that he is able to make such a
commitment (together with everything it entails) while she is not. And,
when the full measure of their characters has been taken, this marks
them as radically dissimilar from one another, whatever their temporary
'affinities' appear to be. It requires only time for this radical
dissimilarity to become explicit.
Their dissimilarities appear when she allies
herself, however sporadically, with the Lintons and oscillates between
identifying with them and with Heathcliff. When Heathcliff throws hot
applesauce at Edgar and is banished, Catherine initially seems
unconcerned and later goes off to be with Heathcliff. Her
rebelliousness changes from the open defiance of throwing books into
the kennel to covert silence and a double character. Catherine both
knows Heathcliff and does not know him; she sees his avarice and
vengefulness, but believes that he will not injure Isabella because she
warned him off. Catherine's mistaken belief that she and Heathcliff
still share an affinity moves her to distinguish in their last
conversation between the real Hathcliff whom she is struggling with and
the image of Heathcliff which she has held since childhood. It is with
the false image that she has an affinity:
Oh, you see, Nelly! He
would not relent a moment, to keep me out of hte grave! That is
how I'm loved! Well, never mind! That is not my Heathcliff. I
shall love mine yet; and take him with me–he's in my soul.
The fact that to maintain the fiction of their
affinity Catherine has to create two Heathcliffs, an inner and an outer
one, suggests that total affinity does not exist and that complete
mergining of two identities is impossible.
- Catherine is similarly deluded about her childhood
and has painted a false picture of the freedom of Wuthering Heights.
- Catherine's assertion that Heathcliff is "more myself
than I am" is generally read as an expression of elemental passion. But
is it possible that she is using Heathcliff as a symbol of their
childhood, when she had freedom of movement and none of the
responsibilities and pressure of adulthood, when she was "half savage,
and hardy and free"? Does Catherine become, in the words of Lyn
Pykett, "the object of a competitive struggle between two men, each of
whom wants her to conform to his own version of her"?
Brontë: Table of Contents
March 14, 2011
|
|
|