| |
This page is under construction. In its present
form, it is a series of disconnected notes; please read it in this
spirit.
I AM HEATHCLIFF
- How deep a chord Emily strikes with the relationship of Catherine
and Heathcliff is shown by the use Simone de Beauvoir makes of
it in writing of the French tradition of the grandes amoureuses
or the the great female lovers. Catherine's affirmation
"I am Heathcliff" is for de Beauvoir the cry of every
woman in love. In her feminist, existentialist reading, the woman
in love surrenders her identity for his identity and her world
for his world; she becomes the incarnation or embodiment of the
man she loves, his reflection, his double. The basis for this
relationship lies in the roles society assigns to males and females.
The male is the standard or norm, the One; he is the subject who
is capable of choice, of acting, of taking responsibility, and
of affecting his destiny. The female, who is measured against
the standard of the male, becomes the Other, dependent on him;
she is an object to be acted upon by man, the subject; she is
given meaning and status by her relationship to him. She is taught
to regard man as godlike and to worship him; the goal of her existence
is to be associated with him, to love him and be loved by him,
because this allows her to share in his male power and sovereignty.
She achieves happiness when the man she loves accepts her as part
of his identity. In reality, because no man is godlike, she is
ultimately disappointed but refuses to acknowledged his fallibility;
because no man can give her either his ability to act and choose
or the character to accept responsibility for those actions and
choices, she does not really achieve or even participate in his
status as subject or standard. She remains dependent, Other. It
comes as no surprise, then, to find that the woman in love, who
is seldom the wife, at least in France and Italy, is the woman
who waits.
- Catherine implies that their love is timeless and exists on
some other plane than her feelings for Linton, which are conventionally
romantic. If their love exists on a spiritual or at least a non-material
plane, then she is presumably free to act as she pleases in the
material, social plane; marrying Edgar will not affect her relationship
with Heathcliff. By dying, she relinquishes her material, social
self and all claims except those of their love, which will continue
after death. Heathcliff, in contrast, wants physical togetherness;
hence, his drive to see her corpse and his arrangements for their
corpses to merge by decaying into each other.
- If identity rather than personal relationship is the issue or
the nature of their relationship, then Catherine is free to have
a relationship with Edgar because Heathcliff's feelings and desires
do not have to be taken into account. She needs to think only
of herself, in effect.
- In Lord David Cecil's view, conflict arises between unlike characters,
and the deepest attachments are based on characters' similarity
or affinity as expressions of the same spiritual principle. Thus,
Catherine loves Heathcliff because as children of the storm they
are bound by their similar natures. This is why Catherine says
she loves Heathcliff "because he's more myself than I am.
Whatever our souls are made of, his and mine are the same.."
As the expression of the principle of the storm, their love is,
of course, neither sexual nor sensual.
- Because of the merging of their identities or, perhaps it would
be more accurate to say, because of their intense desire to merge
and refusal to accept their literal separateness, Catherine's
betrayal of her own nature destroys not only her but threatens
Heathcliff with destruction also.
- Is Catherine deluding herself with this speech? Louis Beverslius
answers yes, Catherine is preoccupied, if not obsessed with the
image of herself "as powerfully, even irresistibly, attracted
to Heathcliff." Their bond is a negative one:
they identify with one another in the face of a common
enemy, they rebel against a particular way of life which both
find intolerable. It is not enough, however, simply to reject
a particular way of life; one cannot define oneself wholly in
terms of what he despises. One must carve out for oneself an
alternative which is more than a systematic repudiation of what
he hates. A positive commitment is also necessary. The chief
contrast between Catherine and Heathcliff consists in the fact
that he is able to make such a commitment (together with everything
it entails) while she is not. And, when the full measure of
their characters has been taken, this marks them as radically
dissimilar from one another, whatever their temporary 'affinities'
appear to be. It requires only time for this radical dissimilarity
to become explicit.
Their dissimilarities appear when she allies herself, however
sporadically, with the Lintons and oscillates between identifying
with them and with Heathcliff. When Heathcliff throws hot applesauce
at Edgar and is banished, Catherine initially seems unconcerned
and later goes off to be with Heathcliff. Her rebelliousness
changes from the open defiance of throwing books into the kennel
to covert silence and a double character. Catherine both knows
Heathacliff and does not know him; she sees his avarice and
vengefulness, but believes that he will not injure Isabella
because she warned him off. Catherine's mistaken belief that
she and Heathcliff still share an affinity moves her to distinguish
in their last conversation between the real Hathcliff whom she
is struggling with and the image of Heathcliff which she has
held since childhood. It is with the false image that she has
an affinity:
Oh, you see, Nelly! He would not
relent a moment, to keep me out of hte grave! That is
how I'm loved! Well, never mind! That is not my Heathcliff.
I shall love mine yet; and take him with mehe's in my
soul.
The fact that to maintain the fiction of their affinity Catherine
has to create two Heathcliffs, an inner and an outer one, suggests
that total affinity does not exist and that complete mergining
of two identities is impossible.
- Catherine is similarly deluded about her childhood and has painted
a false picture of the freedom of Wuthering Heights.
- Catherine's assertion that Heathcliff is "more myself than
I am" is generally read as an expression of elemental passion.
But is it possible that she is using Heathcliff as a symbol of
their childhood, when she had freedom of movement and none of
the responsibilities and pressure of adulthood, when she was "half
savage, and hardy and free."? Does Catherine become, in the
words of Lyn Pykett, "the object of a competitive struggle
between two men, each of whom wants her to conform to his own
version of her"?
Brontë: Table of Contents
March 28, 2004
|
|
|