Core Studies 3
Spring 1999
Prof.
P. Currah
PEOPLE, POWER, AND POLITICS
Essay Assignments
Essay Assignment 2: (Choose one topic)
Note: You may refine any of these topics, develop different approaches to them,
to suit your own interests.
1. Michael Levine writes, "The U.S. Constitution is for white people."
How was race embedded into the U.S. Constitution? Is Levine's statement still true?
Why or why not?
2. How does the "racial context" of Latin America differ from that of
the US? From your analysis, what larger conclusions might you draw about the concept of
race and its relation to power?
3. Which theory of feminism described in the article by Jaggar and Rothenberg
best explains the wage gap between men and women? Why? (Evaluate all the theories of
feminism in relation to this question.)
4. Identify and examine the connections between sexism and homophobia. How
does the cultural construction of gender categories relate to cultural anxieties about
sexual orientation?
Due:
May 6th, in class.
Drafts:
You may turn in drafts (hard copy or email) to me at any stage of this process.
Length:
Five - six pages, typed and double-spaced, including endnotes, footnotes, or works
cited.
Style
Brooklyn College Policy on Academic Integrity
Read it and see specific
examples of plagiarism
Essay Assignment 1: (Choose one topic)
1. What are some of the differences between Weber's notion of a status group and
Marx's notion of class? From your analysis of these differences, how might you
characterize the differences between Marx's (explicit) theory of power and Weber's more
implicit theory of power? You might analyze this question by referring to
Steinberg's analysis of "the underclass," Frankenberg's analysis of
"whiteness," or Katz's analysis of "heterosexuality." How would
Marx and Weber's characterization of these identities differ?
2. Discuss the similarities and differences between Locke and Marx's theories of labor,
the state, and power.
3. Describe the assumptions of human nature in the theories of Locke, Marx, Weber, and
Foucault. How do the differences in these theorists ideas about human nature affect their
theory of power?
4. How is Foucault's analysis of "truth" not simply a reiteration of
Marx's notion of ideology or the "third dimension of power"? This is
another topic you might analyze by referring to Steinberg's analysis of "the
underclass," Frankenberg's analysis of "whiteness," or Katz's analysis of
"heterosexuality."
Due:
March 18th, in class.
Drafts:
You may turn in drafts (hard copy or email) to me at any stage of this process.
Length:
Five - six pages, typed and double-spaced, including endnotes, footnotes, or works
cited.
Style
Brooklyn College Policy on Academic Integrity
Read it and see specific
examples of plagiarism
|